A Goon Show Essay

Many Years ago, the esteemed Secretary and acting chairman of the GSPS, Richard Usher, wrote this essay for his university course.


WITH REFERENCE TO THE GOON SHOW, DISCUSS THE WAYS IN WHICH IT MAY BE TERMED POPULAR CULTURE

In discussing the way in which The Goon Show can be termed Popular Culture, one must first analyse aspects of the programme’ s history, and the society in which it appeared. The programme proper materialized on radio through a whole range of pressures, both from the performers and creators of the programme using newspaper publicity:

and their existing celebrity status in Music Hall, and the pressures of a “tremendous appetite for change” (Edward Blishen, Carry On Up The Zeitgeist, BBC Radio 4, 1 April 1992) that existed at the end of the Second World War and the 1945 general election. Up until the start of the programme in 1951, the standard of BBC Radio comedy had been set by traditionally accepted formats from other mediums:

This then, was the state of things prior to the Second World War. Radio comedy was still in its infancy, and one of the earliest developments came in 1939 with the first broadcast of ITMA (It’s That Man Again):

The series sustained a listenership throughout the War years, proving to be both a success, and a foreshadow of The Goon Show to come. Post War, things in society were changing. As Edward Blishen put it in his radio documentary series, studying Post War society:

A cultural change was developing due to situations that had arisen during the War years:

As writer Johnny Speight pointed out in Blishen’s programme the War educated him:

In his Notes on Deconstructing the Popular, Stuart Hall points out that Popular Culture has a habit of changing in such a way that something that as popular as ITMA may not remain satisfying after great social upheaval created by such events as war:

The Goon Show was the culmination of the ideas of four ex-servicemen, Spike Milligan, Michael Bentine, Peter Sellers and Harry Secombe. None of them could believe, as Bentine put it in one interview:

Bentine had been one of the first RAF officers to witness the liberation of the Belsen concentration camp, Milligan had been blown up whilst on active service, and these two men were the driving force behind the creation of the programme and the Goon concepts. This is an indication of a counter culture beginning to develop, challenging the ideology of a society that was still vulnerable to cultural change. A hegemonic clash created out of humour emerged with the return of servicemen who saw at one and the same time the value of, and need for, a disciplined society, and the absurdity of these same values. As another contributor to Edward Blishen’s study points out, this juxtaposition of values created the essence of Goon humour, and assisted in it gaining popularity:

The dissatisfaction with the general ideology of military life was heightened by such things:

Very much a society with military overhangs, and a patriarchal one as well. A hegemonic situation where women were concerned in this society also gave rise to more absurdity, with their needs being considered in the 1945 General Election:

The Goon Show arrived as a kind of illustration, or expression of the absurdity of the society which gave birth to it. The programme stirred up controversy and entered straight into a battle with authority – the first of many such battles that Milligan and Bentine were to have with the BBC. The team of comedians, their producers, and backers were granted their airtime, but the BBC hierarchy held the final decisions, even to the extent of title choice of Crazy People. The very first script gave warning of what was to come in its closing lines:

The BBC regarded the show as iconoclastic, with a leaning towards “disestablishmentarianism in its worst form” (Michael Bentine). Initial audience reaction was favourable, however, with no complaints recorded in the popular press of the time. By the time the second series aired in January 1952 listening figures were reaching three million. According to Raymond Williams in Keywords one definition of Popular Culture is that it is:

Stuart Hall points out that there is a Market or commercial definition of the term Popular Culture, that:

When looking at the evidence put forward so far, The Goon Show would indeed appear to be fitting some of the criteria for being classed as Popular Culture. The Goon Show has always been a part of a strange contradiction where the BBC are concerned. As a concept the BBC were always very wary of its power to influence the mass audience, even to the extent of trying to ban Peter Sellers from impersonating Winston Churchill, which was so convincing that he repeated his performance as a straight voice-acting role in the film The Man Who Never Was. They were also embarrassed by Sellers’ impersonation of the Queen in the guise of the Duchess Boil De Spudswell in The Starlings (a specially recorded Goon Show from August 1, 1954), and by the use of a character by the name of Hugh Jampton, which they didn’t realise was rhyming slang:

Despite these problems and embarrassment’s the BBC saw the commercial draw of the show and its popularity, and The Goon Show survived for ten series. This is further evidence that backs up the case of the programmes place as an example of Popular Culture. Tony Bennett makes the case that Gramsci:

The BBC with its staff of dignified announcers (Andrew Timothy and Wallace Greenslade for The Goon Show) and disciplined producers like Dennis Main Wilson or Peter Eton were able to accommodate the series and thus turned it into a BBC product. Further definitions of Popular Culture include Raymond Williams’ view that examples are:

A view certainly supported by some members of the BBC hierarchy according to Michael Bentine:

The Goon Show also seems to straddle that chasm between being regarded as High Culture as well as Popular Culture. It was a programme that was enjoyed by the masses – series five ratings reached 4½ Million – but which had an elitist core following, due to the bizarre nature of Milligan’s scripts. The shows poured with emotion but had an intelligent and intellectual heart. They called for active imaginations on the part of the listeners, especially when one special sound effects sequence involved the protagonists Neddy Seagoon (Secombe) and Eccles (Milligan) driving around on a brick wall! The shows were always of high quality, another indication of High Culture, but they also appealed to many, which is an indication of Popular Culture. The intellectual side of the programme often stemmed from the scripts and the subsequent performances. The show content and action, as far as characters were concerned, worked on three levels:

Wilmut also points out that the programme contained elements of high culture due to its background nonsense in the writings of Lewis Carroll or Stephen Leacock, or the comedy of the Marx Brothers. So in a sense, The Goon Show also fits Raymond Williams’ other definition of Popular Culture in that the shows are:

One crucial way in which people can relate to a Media text is through the use of stereotyping and representation. The Goon Show is filled with very colourful stereotypes in the way its characters are portrayed. Peter Sellers played the largest number of major and peripheral characters in the shows, and his gift for mimicry meant that many of these creations lived clearly in the imagination, due entirely to the fact that somebody somewhere knew a character just like them. The most striking example is the character of Major Dennis Bloodnok (of the Heavy Underwater Artillery), with whom a large number of ex-servicemen could identify because he was an amalgam of all the most eccentric officers they came across during the Second World War, and many of the contributors to Edward Blishen’s documentary Carry On Up The Zeitgeist make mention of this. Another form of recognition appeared in the form of a racial stereotype with the Indian gentlemen characters of Singhiz Thingz, Singhiz Lalkaka and Babu Banerjee. These beautifully portrayed caricatures were given life by Sellers and Milligan, who both knew and admired the Indian sound and culture very well (Sellers having served there for three years in the RAF, and Milligan having been born and brought up there). They were the first comedians to bring this Indian sound to the ears of the British public, and as Peter Sellers pointed out in an interview, the Indian community leaders in England felt that:

A representation through stereotype that allegedly helped a different culture gain acceptance. Stereotypes very often resist change, and in the decades since The Goon Show finished the sounds and traits of the Sellers/Milligan characters have been repeated by other performers, but without that in-depth cultural knowledge of the originators as a basis. The representation of women and sexuality in The Goon Show was also based on stereotype, again based in the characterisations of Peter Sellers and Spike Milligan. From the “breathy” voice of a seductive femme fatale or the Queen (Sellers) to the doddering quavering voice of Minnie Bannister (Milligan – based upon his own mother), these were the sum total of female characters in the show, so even the world of the Goons, usually so adventurous and forward looking, was subject to a Patriarchal control. Sexuality, especially homosexuality was portrayed always in a strongly humourous way, usually with Sellers adopting a camp voice to play a sailor, put down by Neddy Seagoon (Secombe) with lines like:

Not even Milligan, it appeared, would push the limits of his creation so far – or would he? An interesting representation came to light in the 1970’s, with the publication of Milligan’s Goon Show Scripts, in which he stated that one of the show’s most popular characters – arch cad Hercules Grytpype-Thynne – was homosexual. The character biography reads:

However, according to Roger Wilmut, this was not such a revelation if one looks at the shows:

Milligan’s most recent words on the subject of Grytpype-Thynne emerged in At Last The Go On Show, a documentary for the 40th anniversary of The Goon Show:

Peter Sellers voice selection for this character was interesting, because it was based upon the movie actor George Sanders, a man well known to the cinema-going public, making the stereotype of Grytpype-Thynne as a cad much easier to imagine. What was unknown to Milligan and Sellers at that time was the fact that George Sanders had himself gone through a period of terrible poverty, during which time he would write to his parents in Russia from his school in England, asking for money to patch up his threadbare clothes. The family fortune had been virtually obliterated by the Russian Revolution, and George had to make do with ill-fitting clothes whilst attending an expensive private school. These facts came to light recently in the biography George Sanders: An Exhausted Life by Richard Van Derbeets.


Conclusion
Looking at the many, varied definitions of the concept of Popular Culture (and to some degree High Culture), one can see that The Goon Show does fit the criteria in a whole range of ways. The programme continues to be available on radio, on Compact Discs, cassettes, in book form, and still has a loyal fan-base in The Goon Show Preservation Society. But it is the show’s popularity throughout the 1950’s that ensures that it is a pure example of Popular Culture, despite pockets of resistance to its influence, as Edward Blishen points out when talking about the popularity of the characters at the school in which he worked:


rreferences include:

Edward Blishen, Carry On Up The Zeitgeist, BBC Radio 4, 1992
Available on The Goon Show Compendium Volume TEN

Roger Wilmut, The Goon Show Companion, Robson Books, 1976
Available here

Spike Milligan, Goon Show Scripts
Available here

Tony Bennett, Popular Culture and The turn to Gramsci, from Cultural Theory and Popular Culture
Available here

Michael Bentine, When I Get To Heaven, in conversation with Bishop Richard Holloway


At Last The Go On Show – BBC Radio